Case Reports in Orthopaedic Surgery Journal | Oxford City
  • info@orthopaedicsurgeryjournal.org
  • OX1 3BG, Oxford City, England, UK
  • Submit Manuscript

Article Details

Review Article
Volume 5, Issue 3

Donor-Site Selection for Osteochondral Reconstruction of the Capitellum: A Structured Review of the Literature and Illustrative Case

David Alonso Solis-Estrada1, Ricardo Muñoz-Trevizo2, Román Samuel Priego-Morales3, Héctor Armando Espinoza-Guitérrez1, Carolina Valdez-Velázquez1, Cristina Alejandra Fuentes-Flores1 and Edmundo Berumen-Nafarrate1*

1Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, México
2Hospital General de Chihuahua "Dr. Salvador Zubirán Anchondo", México
3Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, México

*Corresponding author: Edmundo Berumen-Nafarrate, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, México.
E-mail: edmundo.berumen@gmail.com

Received: October 10, 2026; Accepted: November 02, 2026; Published: November 15, 2026

Donor-Site Selection for Osteochondral Reconstruction of the Capitellum: A Structured Review of the Literature and Illustrative Case
Abstract

Background: Osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) is an established treatment for unstable osteochondral lesions of the humeral capitellum, but the choice of donor site remains unresolved. Conventional donor sites are anatomically distant from the elbow and carry recognised morbidity, which has driven interest in ipsilateral alternatives.

Objective: To review the published evidence on donor-site selection for osteochondral reconstruction of the capitellum, including clinical outcomes, donor-site morbidity, ipsilateral donor options, non-articular autologous bone grafting, and the anatomical constraints of the medial epicondylar region; and to illustrate the resulting principles with a surgical case.

Methods: A structured search of the indexed literature was performed in September 2026, covering clinical outcomes and donor-site morbidity of osteochondral autograft transfer, ipsilateral and extra-articular donor alternatives, and the anatomy of the medial epicondylar region. Findings are synthesised narratively by donor site.

Results: Return to sport after OAT for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is reported in approximately 97% of patients across 24 studies and 470 patients. Donor-site morbidity is 7.8% for knee harvest and 1.6% for costochondral harvest. Two ipsilateral intra-articular donor sites, the non-articulating portion of the radial head and the lateral olecranon tip, have been validated topographically and histologically but not clinically. Non-articular autologous bone from the ipsilateral olecranon has been used successfully in bone peg grafting for early-stage lesions. No published report was identified describing the medial epicondyle as a donor site for capitellar reconstruction.

Conclusion: The evidence supports a hierarchy in which cartilage-bearing donor sites are used to restore the articular surface and non-articular autologous bone is used to restore the subchondral unit. Any extra-articular donor site within the medial elbow must be evaluated against the ulnar nerve, the ulnar collateral ligament origin and the medial epicondylar apophysis, particularly in skeletally immature patients.

Keywords: Capitellum; Osteochondritis dissecans; Osteochondral autograft transfer; Donor site; Elbow arthroscopy; Medial epicondyle; Bone peg grafting; Skeletally immature elbow